prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’
  Download
PDF 211.89 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 21 (2018), 2; 165-179. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165
Vrbljanac, Danijela

Cite this document

Vrbljanac, D. (2018). Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’. Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 21. (2), 165-179. doi: 10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165

Vrbljanac, Danijela. "Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’." Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, vol. 21, no. 2, 2018, pp. 165-179. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165

Vrbljanac, Danijela. "Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’." Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 21, no. 2 (2018): 165-179. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165

Vrbljanac, D. (2018) 'Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’', Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 21(2), pp. 165-179. doi: 10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165

Vrbljanac D. Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’. Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 July 12];21(2):165-179. doi: 10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165

D. Vrbljanac, "Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’", Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 165-179, 2018. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:293596. [Accessed: 12 July 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’
AuthorDanijela Vrbljanac
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
FACULTY OF LAW
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Abstract (english)
This paper analyses the Brussels I bis rule on establishing special jurisdiction for violations of the personality rights on the internet in the light of the recent CJEU’s judgment in Bolagsupplysningen. The existing CJEU’s case law on determining jurisdiction in cases on personality rights established a principle according to which the injured party may commence the proceedings for the entire damage sustained before courts of the Member State in which the publisher’s establishment is and the courts of the Member State in which the injured party’s centre of interest is located. He or she can also sue before courts of every Member State in which the violating content is accessible but only for the portion of damage sustained in that Member State. However, Bolagsupplysningen limited these jurisdictional options. The paper focuses on jurisdictional grounds of injured party’s centre of interest and accessibility criterion underlying the mosaic principle which have been tackled with these new developments.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleZeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Numberingvol. 21, no. 2, pp. 165-179
p-ISSN1435-439X
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:293596
Publication2018
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/975391
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-01-21 10:53:36