prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation
  Download
PDF 175.07 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation
Pravni zapisi, 11 (2020), 1; 69-92. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-26102
Miloš, Matija

Cite this document

Miloš, M. (2020). Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation. Pravni zapisi, 11. (1), 69-92. doi: 10.5937/pravzap0-26102

Miloš, Matija. "Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation." Pravni zapisi, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020, pp. 69-92. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-26102

Miloš, Matija. "Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation." Pravni zapisi 11, no. 1 (2020): 69-92. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-26102

Miloš, M. (2020) 'Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation', Pravni zapisi, 11(1), pp. 69-92. doi: 10.5937/pravzap0-26102

Miloš M. Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation. Pravni zapisi [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 May 10];11(1):69-92. doi: 10.5937/pravzap0-26102

M. Miloš, "Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation", Pravni zapisi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 69-92, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:748030. [Accessed: 10 May 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation
AuthorMatija Miloš
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
FACULTY OF LAW
(Chair of Constitutional Law)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Constitutional Law
Abstract (english)
As an exceptional device in the life of contemporary constitutional democracies, direct democracy is normally considered to be separate from representation. In this paper, I explore this well-established divide, asking how it interacts with our understanding of the central subject of direct democracy, the people. I show how theorizing that takes its cue from the dichotomy between “absence” and “presence”, ascribed to the separation of representation and forms of direct democracy, is tied with identifying the active electorate and the people. On the other hand, this approach is inept for comprehending the ways representations of the people are produced and instrumentalized in the wake of direct democracy. In this paper, I suggest that this phenomenon may be approached by examining how direct democracy is entangled with representing “the people” through arguments, processes and constructs.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titlePravni zapisi
Numberingvol. 11, no. 1, pp. 69-92
p-ISSN2217-2815
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-26102
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:748030
Publication2020
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/1085961
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-02-24 14:15:47