prikaz prve stranice dokumenta IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality
No public access
Professional paper - Editorial
IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 55 (2024), 7; 1051-1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0
Kunda, Ivana

Cite this document

Kunda, I. (2024). IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 55. (7), 1051-1054. doi: 10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0

Kunda, Ivana. "IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality." IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 55, no. 7, 2024, pp. 1051-1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0

Kunda, Ivana. "IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality." IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 55, no. 7 (2024): 1051-1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0

Kunda, I. (2024) 'IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality', IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 55(7), pp. 1051-1054. doi: 10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0

Kunda I. IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law [Internet]. 2024 August 05 [cited 2024 October 20];55(7):1051-1054. doi: 10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0

I. Kunda, "IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality", IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1051-1054, August 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:062444. [Accessed: 20 October 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)IPL and PIL – Exchanging Glances Over Territoriality
AuthorIvana Kunda
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
FACULTY OF LAW
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Abstract (english)
The relationship between intellectual property law (IPL) and private international law (PIL) has been nothing short of a puzzling, dynamic and transformative journey for all stakeholders over many decades. Despite the disciplines’ inescapably similar acronyms, they have managed to escape each other’s paths and remain on separate sides of the legal spectrum for a long time. The blame lies primarily on the principle of territoriality, which traditionally derived from the conception that IPL embodies economic, social and cultural policies of an individual State, which sovereignly confers exclusive rights over these important intangible resources. As such, IPRs were thought to belong to the public law sphere and in any case beyond the reach of foreign States’ courts or laws. Influenced predominantly by the increasing cross-border exploitation and infringement of IPRs, the trend of reduction in the scope and rigorousness of the principle of territoriality appeared gradually. In the European Union, the turning point was the 1968 Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, which resolved the debates concerning adjudicating foreign IPRs.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeProfessional paper - Editorial
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleIIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Numberingvol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1051-1054
p-ISSN0018-9855
e-ISSN2195-0237
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:062444
Publication2024-08-05
Document URLhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40319-024-01513-0
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsClosed access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-09-03 10:41:50