prikaz prve stranice dokumenta (Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje
  Download
PDF 375.86 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
(Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 55 (2018), 4; 755-769. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755
Grbić, Sanja; Bodul, Dejan

Cite this document

Grbić, S. & Bodul, D. (2018). (Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 55. (4), 755-769. doi: 10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755

Grbić, Sanja and Dejan Bodul. "(Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, vol. 55, no. 4, 2018, pp. 755-769. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755

Grbić, Sanja and Dejan Bodul. "(Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 55, no. 4 (2018): 755-769. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755

Grbić, S. and Bodul, D. (2018) '(Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje', Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 55(4), pp. 755-769. doi: 10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755

Grbić S, Bodul D. (Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 April 11];55(4):755-769. doi: 10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755

S. Grbić and D. Bodul, "(Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje", Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 755-769, 2018. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:730751. [Accessed: 11 April 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (croatian)(Nefunkcionalan) institucionalni okvir i problemi ostvarivanja prava na pravično suđenje
Title (english)(Non-functional) institutional framework and problems of exercising the right to a fair trial
AuthorSanja Grbić
AuthorDejan Bodul
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
FACULTY OF LAW
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Abstract (croatian)
Predstečajni postupci su, po svojoj prirodi i zakonskim propisima, postupci in exstremis u cilju očuvanja vrijednosti sredstava i zaštite interesa vjerovnika. Ipak, vrijeme potrebito za otvaranje predstečajnog postupka dulje je od zakonom predviđenih rokova. Stoga unatoč kvalitetno postavljenom normativnom okviru, problemi koji onemogućavaju učinkovitiji predstečajni postupak nisu oni vezani uz tekst zakona i pratećih propisa, već se nalaze u primjeni i/ili izvan samog predstečajnog pravnog okvira. Autori postavljaju tezu – kako reforma predstečajne nagodbe koja je rezultirala predstečajnim postupkom nije bila višestrana – činjenicom da zakonodavac nije predvidio učinke i posljedice koje će zakonske izmjene proizvesti te uslijed toga nije niti pripremio (pravosudni) sustav da ih spremno dočeka. Kompleksnost predmeta istraživanja i postavljeni zadaci uvjetovali su izbor metoda pa je u istraživanju prvenstveno korišten normativno-pravni metodološki pristup. U radu će se analizirati i praksa Europskog suda za ljudska prava u postupcima uz članak 6. jer polazimo od pretpostavke da saznanja o ovome mogu biti ključna za razumijevanje problematike rada.
Abstract (english)
Pre-bankruptcy proceedings are by their nature and legal regulations, procedures in exstremis in order to preserve the value of property and to protect the interests of various creditors. However, the time required for the initiation of the pre-bankruptcy proceeding is longer than the deadline prescribed by the law. Therefore, despite a well-established normative framework, problems that prevent a more effective pre-bankruptcy proceeding are not related to the text of the law and the accompanying regulations, but those are in application and/or outside the pre-bankruptcy legal framework itself. The authors argue - that the reform of the pre-bankruptcy agreement resulted in the pre-bankruptcy proceedings was not multifaceted - the fact remains that the legislator did not foresee the effects and consequences of the legislative changes and therefore did not even prepare a (judicial) system to welcome them readily. The complexity of the subject matter of the research and the set tasks required the choice of methods, so in the research the normative legal methodological approach was primarily used. The paper also analyzes the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the proceedings under Article 6, since the authors are based on the assumption that knowledge of this can be crucial for understanding the main issues of this paper.
Keywords (croatian)
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleZbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu
Numberingvol. 55, no. 4, pp. 755-769
p-ISSN0584-9063
e-ISSN1847-0459
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.130.755
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:730751
Publication2018
Document URLhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/209773
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2019-02-06 07:51:44