prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise
  Download
PDF 714.79 KB
Professional paper - Professional paper
Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34 (2021), 5; 1433-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4
Bajčić, Martina

Cite this document

Bajčić, M. (2021). Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34. (5), 1433-1449. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić, Martina. "Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise." International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 34, no. 5, 2021, pp. 1433-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić, Martina. "Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise." International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34, no. 5 (2021): 1433-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić, M. (2021) 'Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise', International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34(5), pp. 1433-1449. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić M. Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique [Internet]. 2021 November [cited 2024 September 27];34(5):1433-1449. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

M. Bajčić, "Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise", International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1433-1449, November 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:073622. [Accessed: 27 September 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise
AuthorMartina Bajčić
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
FACULTY OF LAW
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philology
Abstract (english)
It has long been noticed that there is no predetermined meaning of legal terms. Rather, meaning depends on the context and the interpreter (Engberg in Brook J Int Law 29:1135, 2003. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol29/iss3 /6). While this assertion holds true for both unilingual and multilingual legal environments, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter: CJEU) openly acknowledges it, by stating that no legal consequences can be based on the terminology used. Accordingly, by virtue of the principle of equal authenticity, when interpreting EU law courts cannot rely on a single language version. Adjudicating legal disputes involving linguistic matters in a multilingual environment-i.e. cases of discrepancies between different language versions of an EU legislative text-the CJEU has been given a fascinating role insofar as its interpretative moves include linguistic comparison, which in turn bears ramifications on uniformity and equal authenticity, as well as on effectiveness of EU law. With a view to unmasking the nature of the linguistic comparison carried out by the CJEU, this study examines settled case law, asking the following questions: What are the central moves of linguistic comparison? What role does it play in the process of CJEU’s decision-making? Has it changed over time?
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeProfessional paper - Professional paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Numberingvol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1433-1449
p-ISSN0952-8059
e-ISSN1572-8722
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:073622
Publication2021-11
Document URLhttps://rdcu.be/dTEcG
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-11-27 09:42:52