prikaz prve stranice dokumenta RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU
  Download
PDF 603.73 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU
Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe, VIII (2019), 2019; 68-79. urn:nbn:hr:118:898920
Bodul, Dejan

Cite this document

Bodul, D. (2019). RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU. Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe, VIII. (2019), 68-79. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:898920

Bodul, Dejan. "RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU." Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe, vol. VIII, no. 2019, 2019, pp. 68-79. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:898920

Bodul, Dejan. "RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU." Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe VIII, no. 2019 (2019): 68-79. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:898920

Bodul, D. (2019) 'RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU', Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe, VIII(2019), pp. 68-79. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:898920 (Accessed 13 January 2025)

Bodul D. RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU. Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 January 13];VIII(2019):68-79. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:898920

D. Bodul, "RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU", Harmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe, vol. VIII, no. 2019, pp. 68-79, 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:898920. [Accessed: 13 January 2025]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (croatian)RASPRAVE O NOVOM MODELU REVIZIJE U HRVATSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU
Title (english)DISCUSSIONS ON A NEW MODEL OF REVISION IN CROATIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW
AuthorDejan Bodul
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
FACULTY OF LAW
(Department of Civil Law)
(Chair of Civil Law)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Civil Law and Civil Procedural Law
Abstract (croatian)
Posljednje godine obilježile su sve izraženije i oštrije rasprave vezane za ulogu sudstva općenito, rasprave o izazovima u vršenju sudske vlasti kao i neslaganja oko odgovarajuće uloge Vrhovnog suda. Stoga i Nacrt prijedloga Zakona o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o parničnom postupku, upućen u javnu raspravu sredinom 2016, a kasnije i novela Zakona o parničnom postupku iz 2019, donose brojne novine u parnični postupak. Svakako jedna od većih, ako ne i najveća, se odnosi i na postupak u povodu revizije kao izvanrednog pravnog lijeka. Naime, empirija ukazuje kako je Vrhovni sud Republike Hrvatske (dalje: VSRH) preopterećen i to najvećim dijelom zbog preširoko definirane mogućnosti pristupa VSRH-u preko instituta revizije, što je dovelo do disfunkcionalnosti u ostvariva nju njegove ustavne funkcije – osiguravanja je dinstvene primjene prava u RH. Upravo zato je izmijenjen i „revizijski dio“ Zakona. Načelna tendencija je u promjeni paradigme revizije prema kojoj je njena javna funkcija jedino prihvatljiva, jer bez nje nema rješenja preopterećenosti Vrhovnog suda. U osnovi, radi se o ideji da Vrhovni sud postane precedentni sud. Ovaj rad je pokušaj opisa stanja stalnih promjena, prvo prikazujući metodologiju rada, a potom prikazujući i komentirajući rasprave oko ovog legislativnog diskursa, kako su to formulirali vodeći hrvatski znanstvenici te suci Vrhovnog suda.
Abstract (english)
The last years have been marked by ever-growing and sharper debates about the role of the judiciary in general, the challenges in the exercise of judicial power, and disagreements over the proper role of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the Draft Law on Amendments to the Law on Civil Procedure, sent to subject to a public hearing in mid-2016, and later amended Civil procedure Act, brought numerous changes to civil proceedings. Certainly one of the most important, if not the most, refers to the procedure on revision as an extraordinary legal remedy. Namely, the statistics indicate that the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia is overburdened, mainly because of the lightly-defined possibility of access to the Supreme Court through the institute of revision, which puts into question the effective realization of its constitutional role. That is why there was an intention to change the revision procedure. The tendency was to change the paradigm of revision according to which its public function is only acceptable, because without it there is no solution of the overcrowded Supreme Court. Basically, this is the idea that the Supreme Court becomes a precedential court. This paper is an attempt to describe the state of constant changes, first showing the methodology of work, and then commenting on contemporary discussions of this legislative discourse, as formulated by leading scientists and judges of the Supreme Court.
Keywords (croatian)
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleHarmonius : Journal of legal and social studies in South East Europe
Numberingvol. VIII, no. 2019, pp. 68-79
p-ISSN2334-6566
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:898920
Publication2019
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/1045933
Document URLhttps://www.harmonius.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Harmonius-2019.pdf
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-01-14 15:27:33